Browse

Latest Headlines

Fresh headlines, crisp visuals — faster reading.

Stephen Colbert's Daughter Leaves '60 Minutes' Amid Growing CBS Turmoil New

Stephen Colbert's Daughter Leaves '60 Minutes' Amid Growing CBS Turmoil

Stephen Colbert’s daughter has resigned from “60 Minutes,” becoming the latest behind-the-scenes producer to leave the venerable newsmagazine as it grapples with a talent exodus, a reportedly unaired Jeffrey Epstein investigation and mounting scrutiny of its future ownership.Madeleine Carlisle, a well-regarded associate producer who joined “60 Minutes” after reporting stints at Time and The Atlantic, resigned from the broadcast in recent days, according to Status.The exit creates an awkward family bookend for CBS.Stephen Colbert’s daughter, Madeleine Carlisle, has resigned from “60 Minutes” amid a wave of behind-the-scenes departures at CBS News. Getty ImagesCarlisle left just months after the network pulled the plug on her father’s top-rated “Late Show,” ending Stephen Colbert’s 11-season run on May 21 after CBS called the cancellation a “purely financial decision.”CBS and Carlisle both declined to comment on her departure.Carlisle’s exit comes as multiple producers have left the program since the May defenestrations of veterans on the team, according to Status. The ouster of journos including correspondents Sharyn Alfonsi and Cecilia Vega, along with executive producer Tanya Simon and executive editor Draggan Mihailovich, has since been come to be called “Black Thursday” by remaining staffers.Additional departures are potentially looming as “60 Minutes” prepares to return next month under the leadership of Bari Weiss and executive producer Nick Bilton, Status reported.The latest personnel shakeup coincides with fresh questions surrounding an Epstein investigation that never made it to air.Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) says he sat for an interview with Alfonsi in March as part of a planned segment examining the relationship between big banks and the late financier and sex offender.Stephen Colbert’s yearslong run as host of “The Late Show with Stephen Colbert” ended earlier this year. Scott Kowalchyk /CBSNeither Wyden’s interview nor the broader Epstein story was ultimately broadcast before the season concluded in May, the senator said.CBS confirmed to The Post that Alfonsi interviewed Wyden for a potential segment but said the full story did not come together for airing during the latest “60 Minutes” season.The network pushed back forcefully against any suggestion the reporting had been shelved for editorial or political reasons.“We are proud of our aggressive and extensive reporting on the Epstein scandal. That reporting continues. We air pieces when they are ready and suggesting that an interview is being ‘suppressed’ for any reason is categorically false,” a CBS News spokesperson said.Carlisle joined “60 Minutes” after reporting stints at TIME and The Atlantic, according to her professional profile.Alfonsi’s departure was part of a broader purge of marquee talent at “60 Minutes.”CBS declined to renew the veteran correspondent’s contract after she publicly accused management of political interference in delaying her report on Venezuelan migrants held in El Salvador’s CECOT prison, while fellow correspondent Vega was also let go and longtime executive producer Simon was replaced by outsider Bilton.Weeks later, CBS fired Scott Pelley after the 37-year network veteran confronted management over the overhaul, while Anderson Cooper separately ended his nearly two-decade run as a part-time correspondent in February, saying he wanted to spend more time with his family.CBS News editor-in-chief Bari Weiss has faced scrutiny over the direction of “60 Minutes” as the program contends with staff turnover. Getty ImagesThe developments come as Paramount’s proposed merger with Warner Bros. Discovery continues to face an antitrust challenge from a coalition of state attorneys general, with CNN increasingly becoming the public focus of the political fight.On Tuesday, TKO Group executive chairman Ari Emanuel endorsed the idea of creating an editorial board to oversee CNN in an effort to ease concerns over future media ownership if the merger proceeds.Speaking on CNBC’s Squawk Box, Emanuel said the litigation challenging the deal is “a little bit about politics, about CNN,” and suggested “an editorial board” could be established over the news organization to make sure “everybody’s calm about news and possibly Larry Ellison controlling CNN and CBS.”“60 Minutes” executive producer Nick Bilton is preparing the newsmagazine for its fall return amid a series of staff departures. Getty ImagesEmanuel’s remarks came after Paramount chief executive David Ellison argued in a New York Times opinion essay that CNN has become the real flashpoint in the merger litigation and pledged the combined company would play news coverage “down the middle.”Emanuel echoed Ellison’s public defense of the transaction while proposing an outside editorial structure intended to blunt concerns about the Ellison family’s influence over major news organizations.Whether the proposal gains traction remains unclear.A federal judge is expected to decide whether the states’ challenge proceeds to trial later this year or slips into 2027.

Aug 05, 2026
Bernie Sanders' $2,400 Social Security Boost: What's the Catch? New

Bernie Sanders' $2,400 Social Security Boost: What's the Catch?

Millions of Social Security recipients could see their annual benefits increase by $2,400 under a proposal championed by Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.Sanders, an independent who caucuses with the Democrats, urged the party to back the expansion of the retirement program rather than benefit cuts as Congress debates the program's long-term financial future. “If Congress does not act within the next six years, Social Security benefits will be cut by 22 percent. We have an obligation to the American people to ensure that never happens,” Sanders wrote in a "Dear Colleague" letter sent to Democratic lawmakers this week. “Just as importantly, we have a responsibility to tell the American people exactly where we stand. Americans deserve to know not only how we will extend Social Security's solvency, but how we will address the retirement crisis facing millions of seniors today.”Sanders said that based on a 2023 analysis by the Social Security Administration's chief actuary, lawmakers could extend the program's solvency for 75 years while simultaneously increasing benefits by $2,400 a month.“At a time when the wealthiest people in America are becoming much wealthier, asking them to pay the same percentage of their income into Social Security as teachers, nurses, firefighters, and construction workers is not a radical idea,” Sanders said. “It is common sense. It is what the American people want.”...Why It MattersThe future of program funding is in question after the Social Security Administration (SSA) reported that the trust fund is projected to be unable to pay full scheduled benefits beginning in 2032. Without congressional action, the program would be able to pay only about 78 percent of promised benefits, resulting in an automatic 22 percent cut for more than 70 million Americans who rely on the program. Many retirees already struggle financially despite Social Security's annual cost-of-living benefit increases. According to Sanders, more than 20 percent of seniors are trying to survive on less than $15,000 a year, while nearly half are living on less than $30,000. What to KnowCurrently, workers and employers each pay a 6.2 percent Social Security payroll tax, but only on earnings up to a certain limit. In 2026, that cap is $184,500, meaning income above that threshold is not subject to Social Security payroll taxes. Sanders said the structure disproportionately benefits the nation's highest earners. “What does that mean? It means that Elon Musk—the wealthiest man in the world, worth an estimated $690 billion—pays the same amount into Social Security as someone earning $184,500 a year,” Sanders said. “It means that someone making $184,500 pays 6.2 percent of every dollar they earn into Social Security. But someone making ten times that amount—$1.845 million—pays just 0.6 percent of their income into the system. That is grossly unfair. That has got to change.”Under Sanders’ plan, Social Security payroll taxes would be applied to all income above $250,000, including investment income such as capital gains and dividends. Sanders said this would not increase taxes for the bottom 91 percent of Americans, who earn less than $250,000 annually. “Bernie Sanders is adamantly opposed to the privatization of Social Security, so he is wanting to remove the Social Security cap on dividends and income above $250,000 while also making that income subject to payroll taxes,” Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek. “Any tax increase would be unpopular, yet it is feasible.”If Sanders’ proposed change went into effect, he said it could extend Social Security's solvency for 75 years while increasing benefits by approximately $2,400 per year. Additionally, millions of seniors could be lifted out of poverty.Who Would Be AffectedSanders’ proposal would have implications for current retirees and future beneficiaries. More than 70 million Americans currently receive Social Security benefits.The majority of recipients could benefit from Sanders’ proposed increase in monthly payments, while high-income individuals with annual earnings exceeding $250,000 would face higher Social Security taxes under the plan. However, not everything would exactly be fixed, Thompson cautioned.“The real concern is that even if you raise the cap, it doesn’t solve the Social Security funding issue entirely,” Thompson said. “It will have to be a multifaceted approach while the cap is just a singular component towards an overall solution. It is definitely a move in the right direction. However, far more is needed.”Political HurdlesDespite the financial benefit to a large number of Americans, Sanders’ proposal faces an uncertain path in Congress. He and other progressives have repeatedly advocated for expanding Social Security benefits, but Republicans have generally opposed increasing payroll taxes on high-income earners. Similar legislation introduced by Sanders has failed to advance, and the current Congress remains divided on how to address the program's financial challenges. “The proposal would be financially feasible only if Congress is willing to approve the accompanying tax increases on higher earners, and it's unlikely to find much agreement on revising tax policy at this point to solve the coming funding problems,” Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek.What Happens NextSanders is encouraging Democratic lawmakers to publicly support expanding Social Security and eliminating the earnings cap for high-income Americans. However, any changes to benefits or taxes would ultimately require congressional approval and the president's signature before taking effect. “If the proposals are dead, then we need alternatives,” Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek. “Social Security is too important to our seniors to let the problems sit and fester.”Contact Newsweek editors on this story: Jason Lemon and Dave Siminoff.

Aug 05, 2026
Ohio Mother of 16 Faces Shocking Trial Twist New

Ohio Mother of 16 Faces Shocking Trial Twist

The mother of 16 “almost feral” children who were kept in a feces-covered, sickening Ohio house of horrors has requested a mental health evaluation to determine whether she’s fit to stand trial.Elizabeth Siders, 33, may be “suffering from mental health issues and that competency may be an issue and a clear impediment to the defendant’s ability to assist in her own defense,” her lawyer, Thomas Stolly, wrote in a new motion, according to FOX8. Elizabeth Siders, 33, is facing 16 counts of child abuse charges after as many children were removed from a house of horrors in Vinton County, Ohio. Southeastern Ohio Regional JailStolly also claimed in the motion that Siders’ mental state “would also have affected her ability to understand the wrongfulness of her conduct at the time of the alleged offenses.”If the motion is approved, Southeastern Ohio Regional Jail — where Siders is being held — will have 30 days to get a psychiatrist to perform an evaluation. Siders, her husband Gary Siders Jr., 37, and her mother-in-law Christina Siders, 67, and father-in-law Gary Siders, 73, were arrested in June after authorities targeted their home in Vinton County, Ohio, and found the children who “looked like almost feral animals,” according to police.The children, ranging in age from 18 months to 18 years, were found living in squalor inside a cramped 12-by-12 room in a scene Ohio Attorney General Andy Wilson described as “pure evil.”Authorities allegedly found children, ages 1 to 18, living in squalor and isolation inside a cramped 12-by-12 room at the home on June 30, 2026. New York PostThe deplorable interior of the residence at 182 Ohmer is pictured in Hamden, Ohio. New York PostThe suspects are each facing 16 counts of 16 counts of disturbing child abuse charges.Christina and Gary Siders Jr. were cleared for evaluations last week. Siders Sr. has been released from custody due to an unexpected medical emergency.Elizabeth recently looked sheepish and horrified as she was searched by officers at Southeastern Ohio Regional Jail last month, attempting to abscond a mysterious mark on her arm, according to video obtained by Plunder True Crime. 

Aug 05, 2026
Secret FBI Investigation: Was Trump Really a Russian Agent? New

Secret FBI Investigation: Was Trump Really a Russian Agent?

WASHINGTON — The FBI opened an investigation into whether President Trump was “wittingly or unwittingly” acting as a Russian agent when he fired then-Director James Comey in 2017, according to bombshell documents released by the White House Wednesday.The probe, called Oxferd Comma, grew out of Crossfire Hurricane, the bureau’s probe into whether Trump’s 2016 campaign colluded with the Kremlin to get the 45th president elected.The Trump White House initially cited Comey’s handling of the investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal email server as the reason for his dismissal — but it was later revealed the president fired Comey because he wouldn’t publicly state that Trump was not a target of Crossfire Hurricane. Former FBI Director James Comey testifies in front of the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday, July 30, 2026, in Washington, DC. (Jack Gruber) USA TODAY Network via Reuters ConnectThe May 16, 2017, memo opening Oxferd Comma was approved by then-FBI General Counsel James A. Baker and Bill Priestap, assistant director of the bureau’s counterintelligence division.The probe was meant to “determine if President Trump is or was directed by, controlled by, and/or coordinated activities with, the Russian Federation in a manner constituting a threat to the national security of the United States and/or a violation of federal criminal statutes,” the memo said.“In addition, this investigation will also seek to determine whether President Trump and others yet to be named obstructed and/or conspiracy to obstruct any associated FBI investigation.”Trump was not under personal investigation for collusion with Russia during the 2016 campaign, but his firing of Comey raised questions about possible obstruction of justice, which triggered an investigation headed by then-special counsel Robert Mueller, a former FBI director.Oxferd Comma was closed on April 9, 2019, with no charges against Trump. US President Donald Trump announces an executive order establishing the Presidential Military Spouse Commission in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, DC, on Monday, August 3, 2026. Allison Robbert/POOL/EPA/ShutterstockThe Mueller investigation also found no evidence that President Trump or any of his aides coordinated with Russia in 2016 but did find the campaign had some contact with individuals with ties to the Kremlin.Trump has frequently raged about Crossfire Hurricane and the Mueller probe, calling the investigations a “witch hunt” and using them to claim the government was being weaponized against him. He accused the FBI of targeting him and has often refered to Comey as a “dirty cop.”

Aug 05, 2026
Sophie Rain's Jaw-Dropping Transformation: What Sparked the Frenzy? New

Sophie Rain's Jaw-Dropping Transformation: What Sparked the Frenzy?

One of OnlyFans' most successful creators, Sophie Rain, has sparked fresh debate online after posting a side-by-side comparison of herself at prom and today. The 20-year-old, who has become a multi-millionaire through the subscription platform, shared the two photos on social media with the caption: "how it started vs how it's going." The OnlyFans star shares contrasting images At just 20 years old, Sophie Rain became one of the top earners on OnlyFans. Credit: Sophie Rain / Instagram The first image shows a teenage Rain smiling in her prom dress, while the second features her aboard a private jet, showcasing a noticeably different look several years later. Rain has become one of the platform's highest earners and has frequently attracted headlines after revealing that, despite her career in adult content, she is still a virgin. She has previously claimed she has rejected multiple offers worth five and six figures from people seeking to pay for her virginity, saying she has no intention of accepting them. Social media responds Her latest post quickly generated thousands of reactions, with many users commenting on the dramatic transformation between the two photographs. One X user wrote: "The girl on the left is what most men would marry regardless of stature. That girl was also(presumably) innocent and a virgin. You are no longer either." Another simply commented: "Soo much change happens ?!" A third user praised the transformation, writing: "I think that's what they call a glow-up." Meanwhile, another person appeared stunned by the comparison, adding: "Ain't no way the same girl." Rain claimed that she earned $83 million for her content in 2025 alone, after making $43 million in her first year selling content on OnlyFans. However, the US-based adult star recently revealed that she has been lying to followers about her age, admitting that she was actually 19 when she signed up. Featured Image. Credit: Sophia Rain / Instagram

Aug 05, 2026
Why Everyone's Talking About 'Symbiosexual' Attraction New

Why Everyone's Talking About 'Symbiosexual' Attraction

Now more than ever, more people are coming out as 'symbiosexual' - and we're not surprised. Sexuality is a complex aspect of human identity, influenced by a wide range of biological, psychological, social, and cultural factors. It is not simply about sexual orientation or behavior but encompasses desires, attractions, emotional connections, and personal experiences that can change over time. People’s understanding of their own sexuality can be fluid and influenced by their environment, upbringing, societal norms, and individual life experiences. Sexuality is a complex aspect of human identity. Credit: Igor Ustynskyy / Getty Cultural expectations, religious beliefs, and social pressures can further complicate one’s expression of sexuality, often leading to inner conflicts or confusion. Cue symbiosexualism. Love triangles have been a staple part of narratives throughout storytelling history, but scientists now believe that this has influenced an entirely new sexuality. A new study by researchers at Seattle University has identified that 'symbiosexual' people are attracted to the energy between established couples rather than between themselves and one other person, bringing a whole new meaning to the more, the merrier. Symbiosexualism is a newly researched sexuality type. Credit: Maskot/Getty This type of sexuality is described as "attraction to the energy, multidimensionality, and power shared between people in relationships," as per a definition provided by the Archives of Sexual Behavior when discussing a previous 2023 study titled 'The Pleasure Study.' The study, which surveyed 373 participants about aspects of their sexual and gender identity, also found that a large portion of participants in the study actually felt romantic and sexual attraction to the “synergy” of a third person being thrown into the mix. And in a world filled with open relationships and sexual freedom, we're not surprised. Credit: Visoot Uthairam/Getty Speaking of the outcome, Dr. Sally Johnston, an adjunct professor of anthropology and sociology who conducted the study, said: "We need to rethink the nature of human attraction and desire as only one-to-one experiences." Further research into the topic found that there was a "lack of recognition and validation for this attraction," even within the polyamorous community and this often led to the mistreatment of the third person within the relationship. The findings of the studies mentioned above allegedly "push the boundaries of the concepts of desire and sexual orientation in sexuality studies and challenge the ongoing invisibility and invalidation of and stigma and discrimination against such attractions," according to Dr. Johnson. In an interview with the PsyPost, the researcher revealed that she was first interested in delving more into the unique sexuality after "[hearing] people talk openly about experiencing attraction to established couples." "I wanted to learn more about this understudied attraction," she added. Credit: Klaus Vedfelt/Getty After conducting the study, participants were interviewed to get a better understanding of why this sexuality was the best to describe what they were attracted to. One participant, referred to as 'Hayden', said that she was attracted to couples because of "their cohesiveness." "You feed off their energy, their attraction to each other… there’s an interplay between the couple," she added. Another participant, called 'Sage', also added: "I also just want to be smack in the middle of that relationship. I would also like to be included in this relationship... I really think my ideal dynamic might be myself and a couple." While there is not much research out there about this particular desire currently, we're sure there will be much more over the next decade as sexuality continues to broaden. Featured Image Credit: Vladimir Vladimirov/Getty

Aug 05, 2026
Indiana Horror: What Drove This Man to Attack a Newborn? New

Indiana Horror: What Drove This Man to Attack a Newborn?

An Indiana nutjob viciously bit a newborn’s face to stop it from crying — and later allegedly told cops the infant looked like a “busted up egg” when he was done with it.Authorities say Kaden Manuel Lewis Shurm, 18, began by “nibbling” on the 9-day-old baby’s cheek before repeatedly biting in a “chomping down” motion, according to FOX59.Shrum, who tips the scales at a whopping 250 pounds, was arrested and charged with felony battery with injury to a person under 14.  Kaden Manuek Lewis Shrum allegedly bit an infant and claimed the baby looked like an egg. Monroe County Sheriff's Office Shrum’s wanted poster in connection with his bond violation for previous acts. Monroe County Sheriff's OfficeA pediatrician first alerted child protective services to the infant’s injuries on July 14, prompting a probe by the Bloomington Police Department, according to court documents obtained by The Post.The brazen biter reportedly confessed that he bit the child to silence it at around 4 a.m. — initially “nibbling” before escalating until the newborn’s face resembled a “busted up egg.”Shrum was arrested at the hospital; the baby’s current condition remains unknown.It was not immediately clear if Shrum and the child had any relation. The lunatic also faces felony charges in separate cases for battery with a deadly weapon and criminal recklessness, as well as a misdemeanor battery charge.Shrum briefly posted a $5,500 bond on the child abuse charge on July 21 before being re-arrested on a bond revocation warrant for the prior cases.

Aug 05, 2026
Jetstar's Bold Move: Why Passengers Will Pay for Overhead Locker Use New

Jetstar's Bold Move: Why Passengers Will Pay for Overhead Locker Use

For passengers on the budget Australian airline Jetstar, the days of cramming your bag into an overhead locker already full of your seatmates’ full-sized suitcases are coming to an end, but there’s a catch.The carrier will charge passengers for stowing carry-on bags in the overhead compartments, beginning in February 2027.The move came after passengers and airline staff named “having bags weighed at the gate and struggling to find room in overhead lockers as the more stressful parts of the airport experience,” the carrier said in a statement on Wednesday.Australian budget airline Jetstar will soon charge passengers to use overhead compartments for carry-on bags. Space_Cat – stock.adobe.comIt makes Jetstar the latest low-cost carrier to introduce a payment system for carry-on bags, with budget airlines in the United States and Europe commonly charging passengers to use the compartments.Passengers could stow a purse, laptop bag or small backpack that fitted within specified measurements under the seat in front of them for no charge, Jetstar said.The cost of using the overhead compartments in the cabin would start from 25 Australian dollars ($18) one way, with the price depending on the route.Bags stowed in the lockers can weigh up to 10 kilograms (22 pounds) and will no longer be weighed by airline staff as passengers line up to board, Jetstar said.The existing weight limit of 7 kilograms (15 pounds) will be scrapped for the small item placed under travelers’ seats.Starting February 2027, the airline will charge from $18 one way for overhead storage. Jo Panuwat D – stock.adobe.comLike many carriers worldwide, Australian and New Zealand airlines have already introduced charges for checked luggage, seat selection, and some dining and in-flight entertainment options.An industry analyst said, however, that Jetstar was the first to charge for use of the overhead lockers.“It will ruffle feathers because Australian travelers have got such high expectations,” said Sharon Petersen, CEO of AirlineRatings.com. “For such a long time they lived in a bubble of full-service options only.”Jetstar said the change would reduce frustrations at boarding gates.But passengers can still stow a small bag under their seat for free. ISVO – stock.adobe.com“By giving customers an underseat bag with the option to add Priority Carry-on, we can make better use of overhead locker space, streamline boarding and help more flights depart on time,” Jetstar CEO Stephanie Tully said in a statement.She added that the move would ensure customers only paid for what they needed. Petersen, however, said Jetstar’s base fares remained higher than those of low-budget carriers in Europe that had brought in similar policies.“Jetstar’s starting price is generally well above what Ryanair or Wizz Air can offer, largely because Australia lacks that level of competition and because wages, taxes and operating costs sit much higher here,” she said.

Aug 05, 2026
NYC's Bold Grocery Plan Sparks Outrage: What Critics Are Saying New

NYC's Bold Grocery Plan Sparks Outrage: What Critics Are Saying

Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s plan for five city-owned grocery stores has a shockingly bad business model, industry insiders argued, citing the administration’s newly released “request for proposals.”The socialist mayor has long touted his plan to bring New Yorkers cheaper goods by opening a “publicly-funded, privately-operated” supermarket in each borough.The socialist mayor has long touted his plan to bring New Yorkers cheaper goods by opening “publicly-funded, privately-operated” groceries throughout the five boroughs. Gregory P. Mango for NY PostBut the New York City Economic Development Corporation’s 44-page RFP released last week — seeking contracting bids from vendors to run the shops — reveal the “ridiculous idea” will only lead to “crappy” stores, Chicago restaurateur Nick Kokonas claimed.“We have an efficient system… just change the outcomes,” Kokonas said in an X thread Monday blasting the city’s plan. But a recent analysis of the New York City Economic Development Corporation’s plans for the grocery stores reveals that the “ridiculous idea” will only lead to “crappy” stores, restaurateur Nick Kokonas claimed. Gregory P. Mango for NY PostWhile the RFP states that bidders who “seek to run all five (5) sites” are preferred, so far only two of the locations – one in Manhattan and the other in The Bronx – have actually been identified by City Hall, Kokonas noted.“Bidders are supposed to price unknown stores in unknown neighborhoods by assuming they’re ‘about 15,000 sq ft.’ Absurd,” Kokonas said, in the thread, which quickly went viral.The RFP also notes the city paying for “the design and fit out of sites” – while the responsibility for the upkeep of the stores will fall on the laps of the operators. While the RFP says that preference is given to bidders who “seek to run all five (5) sites,” only two of the five locations – one in Manhattan and another in the Bronx – have actually been identified.  Gregory P. Mango for NY PostOther bizarre choices highlighted in the plan by Kokonas include the grocery’s stated goal to have a “limited” variety of foods – while also carrying kosher, halal, vegan, dairy-free and diabetic options.  Gregory P. Mango for NY Post“So NYC makes the capital decisions while someone else pays for the consequences,” said the businessman.Other bizarre choices highlighted in the plan by Kokonas included the stated goal for the supermarkets to offer a “limited” variety of foods – while also carrying kosher, halal, vegan, dairy-free and diabetic options. He also noted that the subsidized “Core Basket” of goods — items to be offered at 30% below market price, according to City Hall — could include “chicken salad, egg salad, potato salad, fruit salad and other deli-prepared foods.”But the stores won’t have food preparation on site or a deli counter, according to the RFP, so “you’re going to ship them in every day prepared. Gotcha…,” Kokonas wrote.Also eyebrow-raising, City Hall recently confirmed ID will not be required to shop — meaning anyone, regardless of income or residency, can purchase the taxpayer subsidized groceries.“No means test. Anyone can shop there. So taxpayers will subsidize groceries for affluent shoppers who happen to live nearby, while needy families elsewhere get zero,” Kokonas said. “No means test. Anyone can shop there. So taxpayers will subsidize groceries for affluent shoppers who happen to live nearby, while needy families elsewhere get zero,” Kokonas said.  Gregory P. Mango for NY PostOther industry insiders were also befuddled by the RFP.“None of the metrics fit in my experience,” Andy Arons, former owner of Gourmet Garage, told The Post on Tuesday. “They would be so much better by increasing SNAP benefits for those who need it.”Fernando Matteo, of the United Bodegas of America group, called the grocery plan “a f—ing gimmick.”“It makes no sense,” he fumed, adding that if Mamdani “wants to make a difference” on affordability, he should work with existing grocery stores.The mayor’s office and the EDC did not respond to requests for comment. Kokonas couldn’t immediately be reached.

Aug 05, 2026
Revealed: The Shocking Truth Behind 'Zombie Angelina Jolie' New

Revealed: The Shocking Truth Behind 'Zombie Angelina Jolie'

Remember the woman who went viral in 2017 for looking like a corpse version of Angelina Jolie ? Well, it turns out she looks nothing like that and never really did - although most people would have found that pretty obvious from the start. Sahar Tabar, whose real name is Fatemeh Khishvand, is a 25-year-old Iranian woman who became one of the most talked-about people on the internet after posting a series of photos on Instagram that made her look like Jolie had been dug up and reanimated. Sunken cheeks, hollow eyes, a skeletal face that launched a thousand headlines about 'botched plastic surgery' and '50 operations gone wrong'. None of that was true. She used makeup and Photoshop - pretty simple really when you think about it. However, the Iranian government didn't see the funny side, and what happened next was about as far from funny as it gets. Tabar used Photoshop to alter her appearance. Credit: Instagram/sahartabar_official What happened to Sahar Tabar? In October 2019, when she was 18, Iranian authorities arrested her as part of a crackdown on social media influencers. She was charged with blasphemy, inciting violence, encouraging youth corruption, and gaining income through inappropriate means. Iran has some of the strictest internet censorship laws in the world and routinely targets people who are seen to be promoting things it doesn't like. In December 2020, she fell foul of those strict rules and was sentenced to 10 years in prison. 10 years, all for posting edited photos of herself on Instagram. While inside, she caught Covid-19 and was reportedly put on a ventilator. Her lawyers pushed for her release on medical grounds. A judge refused that appeal, leading Iranian journalist and women's rights activist Masih Alinejad to publicly call on Angelina Jolie herself to intervene, writing that Tabar's mother 'cries every day' for her daughter. She was eventually released on bail in mid-December 2020, having served around 14 or 15 months. Alinejad confirmed the news on Twitter: "Today Iranian teenager who posted heavily distorted images of herself online and was jailed for 10 years has been freed after massive media pressure." Tabar's Instagram has now been deleted. Credit: Instagram/sahartabar_official What does she actually look like? After her release, Tabar appeared on Rokna, an Iranian state-owned media channel, and showed her real face for the first time. People were genuinely shocked. She looked like a completely normal young woman. She had no skeletal features, no sunken cheeks, and - crucially - nothing remotely zombie-like. Again, most people figured that way before, but it's still a bit of a shock. She explained on the programme that her mother had told her to stop posting the images but she hadn't listened. "Sometimes the words of a stranger or a friend can be more important than those of a parent," she said. She described her posts as a 'vulgarity' that helped her become famous, but said she would not be going back to Instagram. "I would not even put Instagram on my phone anymore," she said. The interview left viewers stunned . "Omg it was makeup thank god," one wrote. Another said: "Wow! It's so sad what lengths people would go to for fame. They should have tackled her body dysmorphia rather than an uncalled-for prison sentence." Tabar's real appearance has come as a surprise. Credit: YouTube/Rokna Was any of it real? For the most part, no. In a 2017 interview with Russian outlet Sputnik before her arrest, Tabar had already admitted the images were created using makeup and digital editing. She said she did it to 'amuse' herself. "Now I can see that I have something in common with her, but I amuse myself, and to look like someone is not my goal," she explained. "Over time I post a photo, I make my face more fun and funny. It is a form of self-expression, a kind of art." She did have some cosmetic work done. A nose job, lip fillers, and liposuction have all been confirmed. But the full zombie look that went viral was makeup, lighting, and Photoshop. The '50 surgeries' story that circulated at the time was never true. Where is Sahar Tabar now? She deleted her Instagram profile in 2019 before her arrest. Iran has since banned Instagram entirely, along with Facebook, X, and most other major Western social media platforms. Tabar has not returned to public life in any significant way since the Rokna interview. She would now be 25 years old. Whether she is still in Iran, still subject to the conditions of her bail, or has moved on entirely from the persona that made her famous and then cost her over a year of her life is not publicly known. What is known is that an 18-year-old girl posted some edited photos of herself on Instagram, went viral, and was arrested by her own government for it. She spent over a year in prison, caught Covid, came out the other side, showed the world her real face, and said she was done with social media for good. The photos were fake, but the prison sentence was very real. Featured image credit: Instagram/Sahar Tabar

Aug 05, 2026
Armed Suspect at Trump Golf Course: What Isn't Being Said? New

Armed Suspect at Trump Golf Course: What Isn't Being Said?

President Trump shrugged off the armed suspect arrested near his Southern California fundraiser this week, brushing aside the security scare and suggesting it comes with the territory of being a president who matters.“The only thing I get a little solace from is they say only consequential presidents, and I am definitely consequential,” Trump told Fox News @ Night host Trace Gallagher during an exclusive interview Tuesday.President Donald Trump appears in an interview on “Fox News @ Night” to discuss the latest on Iran, the economy, and other top headlines. Instagram/foxnewsnightPresident Trump shrugged off the armed suspect arrested near his Southern California fundraiser.An aerial view of the Trump National Golf Club Los Angeles. Getty ImagesInstead of focusing on the arrest of 38-year-old Jeanine John Taele, who authorities say was found Sunday at Trump National Golf Club Los Angeles with weapons and ammunition, Trump pivoted to Iran, the economy and what he called the growing threat of socialism.“I have no choice,” Trump said of Iran. “They can’t have a nuclear weapon.”The president also took aim at the rise of socialist candidates, arguing they “want to ruin the country.”The president also took aim at the rise of socialist candidates, arguing they “want to ruin the country.”Countries taken over by communists and socialists, he said, always become “filthy,” “disgusting” and “dirty.”The interview followed Trump’s rare trip to the Los Angeles area for a Republican National Committee fundraising dinner at Trump National Golf Club Los Angeles in Rancho Palos Verdes.His visit came amid heightened political tensions, with large crowds of supporters and anti-Trump demonstrators gathering outside the venue. California Gov. Gavin Newsom also sharply criticized Trump’s visit through social media and official state channels as the political temperature surrounding the president’s California appearance continued to escalate.

Aug 05, 2026